|
|
 |
|
|
| Vidéos : electromagnetic |
|
|
| Electromagnetic Over Unity Power Plant |
 |
http://www.gammamanager.com/
This uniquely configured rotating machine
generates additional torque on the shaft when
rotated through the magnetic field. Combined
electrical/heat output exceeds input energy
by over 40 percent.
EBM (Energy By Motion) Overunity or perpetual
motion labeled as impossible. This single
device will threaten all other forms of
energy, oil, coal, even solar. the uses of
this device are endless, generating endless
electricity with no fuel. A similar device is
being made into a car engine, smaller devices
can power a house forever for free with zero
emissions. A very small magnetic motor will
run endlessly to charge an electric car.
I have no additional information on this
video other than what you see within the
video. The posting of this video is to
explore the possibilities of cheap or
perpetual energy. There are people who are
violently opposed toward this video and for
some reason attack people on this blog as if
it is a threat to their world.
The opposition is that these devices
contradict every law known today. Ok we got
it!!! There are those that follow laws
because they are trained to do so, then there
are the free thinkers who want to see if they
can find ways to alter what is considered
reality of today or alter existing laws.
People that come here to merely harass will
be blocked, please allow the dreamers to
dream and the inventors to invent.
Help Stop The Suppression Of Inventions
http://www.panacea-bocaf.org/newsletter/newsl
etter.htm
Tags : Electromagnetic Magnetic Over Unity Overunity perpetual motion free energy green |
|
Affichage : 384989
Durée : 390 s |
| Electromagnetic Inertial Propulsion System |
 |
Initial report on project aimed to develop
new way of space travel. This engine is based
on electromagnetism. It utilizes a delay
between two moments: when force field is
created and when it acts on object. Currently
there is a attempt to build levitator using
proper oscillator/impulsator, coil and
permanent magnet.
This is not a science fiction idea. There are
other teams trying to achieve the same by
different methods. Here is short scientific
abstract from adsabs.harvard.edu
Experiments performed by independent research
teams, suggesting that ``propellantless''
propulsion without external assistance is
being achieved by means of electromagnetic
inertia manipulation, are discussed here and
compared within the framework of competing
theoretical formulations. The authors' theory
relies upon the fact that the electromagnetic
(EM) field can exhibit a whole non-vanishing
momentum in the ``matter'' frame, even for
stationary regimes, provided Minkowski's
energy-momentum tensor holds for EM fields in
matter. In a closed system this EM momentum
can be converted into mechanical momentum, so
that electromagnetic inertia intervenes to
modify the inertial properties of the
generating device. Another theory, set forth
by Corum and based on Slepian's works, states
that the inertia manipulation effect stems
from the Heaviside force density in vacuum,
which is shown to lead to a zero
instantaneous volume integrated force on a
closed system. Although the system momentum
is not conserved in the reported experiments,
the propulsion effect is shown to be
consistent with an alternative formulation of
Minkowski's EM force density that correctly
predicts former peer-reviewed experimental
results. A fourth theory by J. Woodward,
based on ``Machian'' mass/inertia
fluctuations due to transient mass
modifications, purportedly predicts the
observed results but flaws are found in the
predictions which, when corrected,
considerably disagree with the experimental
data. Finally, recent developments in vacuum
physics allow building a conceptual framework
with the potential of resolving the apparent
violation of momentum conservation, closely
connected to Minkowski's energy momentum
tensor and its lack of symmetry.
Tags : levitation space travel spacecraft rocket shuttle antigravity inertial propulsion engine magnet aerospace |
|
Affichage : 6399
Durée : 368 s |
| ElectroMagnetic field Spectrum. Are we getting to much radiation? |
 |
http://www.Cellphonelies.com Can
electromagnetic fields (EMF) from power
lines, home wiring, airport and military
radar, substations, transformers, computers
and appliances cause brain tumors, leukemia,
birth defects, miscarriages, chronic fatigue,
headaches, cataracts, heart problems, stress.
nausea, chest pain, forgetfulness, cancer and
other health problems?
Numerous studies have produced contradictory
results, yet some experts are convinced that
the threat is real.
Dr. David Carpenter, Dean at the School of
Public Health, State University of New York
believes it is likely that up to 30% of all
childhood cancers come from exposure to EMFs.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
warns "There is reason for concern" and
advises prudent avoidance".
Martin Halper, the EPA's Director of Analysis
and Support says "I have never seen a set of
epidemiological studies that remotely
approached the weight of evidence that we're
seeing with EMFs. Clearly there is something
here."
Concern over EMFs exploded after Paul Brodeur
wrote a series of articles in the New Yorker
Magazine in June 1989. Because of Paul
Brodeur's reputation. his articles had a
catalytic effect on scientists, reporters and
concerned people throughout the world.
In November 1989, the Department of Energy
reported that "It has now become generally
accepted that there are, indeed, biological
effects due to field exposure."
The EMF issue gained more publicity in 1990
when alarming reports appeared in Time, the
Wall Street Journal, Business Week and
popular computer publications. ABC's Ted
Koppel and CBS's Dan Rather both aired
special segments on EMFs.
In addition to the long-term health concerns,
buying a house with high fields will be an
economic disaster. In a few years, when power
line radiation is as well known as asbestos
and radon, a house with high fields will be
practically impossible to sell. Already there
are hundreds of lawsuits regarding EMFs and
property devaluation.
EPA Says the Threat Is Real
By 1990, over one hundred studies had been
conducted worldwide. Of these, at least two
dozen epidemiological studies on humans
indicated a link between EMFs and serious
health problems. In response to public
pressure, the Environmental Protection Agency
IEPA) began reviewing and evaluating the
available literature.
In a draft report issued in March 1990, the
EPA recommended that EMFs be classified as a
Class B carcinogen -- -a "probable human
carcinogen and joined the ranks of
formaldehyde, DDT, dioxins and PCBs.
After the EPA draft report was released,
utility, military and computer lobbyists came
down hard on the EPA. The EPA's final
revision did NOT classify EMFs as a Class B
carcinogen Rather, the following explanation
was added:"
At this time such a characterization
regarding the link between cancer and
exposure to EMFs is not appropriate because
the basic nature of the interaction between
EMFs and biological processes leading to
cancer is not understood."
Curiously, this rather unusual logic appears
on the same page as the following: "In
conclusion, several studies showing leukemia,
Iymphoma and cancer of the nervous system in
children exposed to supported by similar
findings in adults in several/ occupational
studies also involving electrical power
frequency exposures, show a consistent
pattern of response that suggest a causal
link. "
When questioned about the contradictory
nature of these statements, the EPA responded
that it was "not appropriate" to use the
probable carcinogen label until it could
demonstrate how EMFs caused cancer and
exactly how much EMF is harmful.
This explanation does not satisfy many
critics who claim that the EPAs upper
management was influenced by political and
economic considerations exerted by utility,
computer and military lobbyists
http://www.Cellphonelies.com
Tags : cell phone iphone health emf radiation bluetooth tumor razor biopro sickness prevention qlink cnn disney poisoning treatment |
|
Affichage : 5174
Durée : 189 s |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
|
